Legal Opinion

Matter of University of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1997No. C4-96-2526, C9-96-2411PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (the MPCA) issued an air emissions permit to respondents University of Minnesota and Foster Wheeler Twin Cities, Inc. authorizing renovation of the University’s steam generation system. Relators contend that the MPCA decision to issue the permit is unsupported by substantial evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and based on an erroneous interpretation of the law. We affirm.

FACTS

The University of Minnesota (the University) and Foster Wheeler Twin Cities, Inc. (FTC) respectively own and operate three steam generating plants that provide…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of KlevenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. In re the Northern State Power Co. for Approval of its 1998 Resource PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. In Re American Iron and Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Commissioner of Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API