Legal Opinion
Verdier v. Verdier
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1953No. Civ. 15767PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The principal question upon this appeal turns upon the interpretation properly to be made of a certain provision of the interlocutory decree in this partition suit, a decree which ordered the sale of real property and appointed a referee to conduct the sale. *
The decree as typed and presented to the trial judge directed the referee to sell “at public auction, to the highest and best bidder for cash, lawful money of the United States, such sale to be in the same manner as in sales of real property on execution, and upon and after notice not less than that required by law for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Ex parte AmbroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. Landon White Bail BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.