Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Kahanamoku

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 25, 1946No. Nos. 14, 15PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The petitioners in these cases were sentenced to prison by military tribunals in Hawaii. Both are civilians. The question before us is whether the military tribunals had power to do this. The United States district court for Hawaii in habeas corpus proceedings held that the military tribunals had no such power and ordered that they be set free. The circuit court of appeals reversed, and ordered that the petitioners be returned to prison. 146 F. 2d 576. Both cases thus involve the rights of individuals charged with crime and not connected with the armed forces to have their guilt or innocence…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  5. Ex Parte QuirinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API