United States v. Fosler
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
To establish a violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006), the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt both that the accused engaged in certain conduct and that the conduct satisfied at least one of three listed criteria. The latter element is commonly referred to as the “terminal element” of Article 134 and the government must prove that at least one of the article’s three clauses has been met: that the accused’s conduct was (1) “to the prejudice of good order and discipline,” (2) “of a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by274 opinions
- United States v. WinckelmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. BallanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.