Legal Opinion
Horth v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 1997No. 3:CV-95-118PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Richard M. Horth (Horth), brought this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12201 et seq., claiming that the defendant, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. (General Dynamics), discriminated against him in refusing his request for early retirement benefits. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. (Dkt. Entries 21 & 23.) Because Horth has failed to present evidence sufficient to establish his prima facie ease or to raise an inference that he was denied early retirement benefit as a result of his alleged disability,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Howard Baer, Inc. v. SchaveKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Sadinsky v. Ebco Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Piascyk v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Brower v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Sarko v. Penn-Del Directory Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.