Legal Opinion

Howard Baer, Inc. v. Schave

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 2001-SC-0740-DGPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice LAMBERT.

This Court granted discretionary review to consider what proof is necessary to establish that a medical restriction on heavy lifting is a “disability” for purposes of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act.1 To decide this issue, we must consider whether being disqualified from performance of a single, task-specific job qualifies an individual as disabled under the Act. The United States Supreme Court recently considered this question in two seminal disability discrimination cases, Toyota v. Williams 2 and Sutton v. United Air Lines,3 and we deem it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Robert N. Colwell, Charles R. Ellinger and Richard H. Abrams, Jr. v. Suffolk County Police Department, County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Karen Snow v. Ridgeview Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Cynthia Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, a Division of Dominican Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Cherryl Kirilenko-Ison v. Bd. of Ed. Danville IndependentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Hallahan v. the Courier JournalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  3. Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. LaShaunna Banks v. Bosch Rexroth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Charalambakis v. Asbury UniversityKentucky Supreme Court · 2016

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API