Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. McKinney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1990No. 89-1621PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama, on the relation of Nellie Jo McKinney, petitioned the Court of Civil Appeals for a writ of mandamus, pursuant to Rule 21, A.R.App.P. That court denied the petition. See Ex parte State ex rel. McKinney, 567 So.2d 366 (Ala.Civ.App. 1990). The State now seeks the same relief from this Court. See Rule 21(e). The petition asks for a writ of mandamus ordering Judge George N. Sims of the Talledega County Juvenile Court to set aside his order of February 2, 1990, granting Henry Smoot's Rule 60(b)(6), A.R.Civ.P., motion, in which Smoot had requested relief from a November 15,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Ross v. LutonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Ex Parte BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Ex parte DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte AmSouth BancorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte DCH Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Ex Parte Exide Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API