Legal Opinion

Ex Parte AmSouth Bancorporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1998No. 1961212PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants in an action pending in the Jefferson Circuit Court, AmSouth Bancorporation and certain of its affiliates, petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to set aside its order certifying the action as a class action under Rule 23(b)(3), Ala. R. Civ. P. We grant the petition.

The defendant AmSouth Bank of Alabama ("the Bank") is a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant AmSouth Bancorporation. The defendant AmSouth Investment Services, Inc. ("AIS"), is, in turn, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. AIS brokers sell a variety of investments, such as…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Household Retail Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. University Federal Credit Union v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. SMART PROFESSIONAL PHOTO. v. Childers-SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Berry v. Federal Kemper Life Assur. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API