Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Exide Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1996No. 1950653PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following a hearing on a "Motion to Certify Class" filed in the action brought by Eddie Walton Davis, Pete Melvin McQueen, and Curtis Crews, individually and as class representatives, against Exide Corporation, the trial court, under Rule 23(b)(3), Ala.R.Civ.P., orally "certif[ied] the class."1 We assume that the class the court certified was the class the plaintiffs had requested that it certify, which was:

"All retail customers residing in the State of Alabama who since 1991 purchased used or previously sold Exide batteries which were sold and marketed to them as new, first quality Exide…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Amason v. First State Bank of LinevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ex Parte Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ex Parte Assoc. Fin. Serv. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API