Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1984No. 83-1093PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner (defendant) seeks a writ of mandamus to the trial court, directing it to set aside its order granting respondent's (plaintiff's) Rule 60 (b)(6), A.R.Civ.P., motion and reinstating plaintiff's case after it had been dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff filed this action against the defendant in Mobile Circuit Court on November 19, 1980. The case arose out of the May 16, 1980, collision between the defendant's automobile and plaintiff's motorcycle. Plaintiff's complaint contained allegations of negligence and claimed $250,000 in compensatory damages for the personal injuries he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Textron, Inc. v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Raine v. First Western BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. McDowell-Purcell, Inc. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Nunn v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Ex Parte DCH Regional Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Guaranty Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Ex Parte RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API