Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1985No. 84-782PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner (defendant) seeks a writ of mandamus to the trial court directing it to allow an evidentiary hearing in order to permit defendant to present evidence and cross-examine appraisers appointed by the court pursuant to Code of 1975, §35-6-101, in an action for a sale of property for division. The writ is denied.

The relevant facts are as follows:

Pursuant to Code of 1975, § 35-6-100, respondent (plaintiff) filed a petition for a sale for division as to property jointly held with the defendant. Section 35-6-100 provides as follows:

"Upon the filing of any petition for a sale for division of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Ross v. LutonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Ex Parte BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Echols v. Housing Authority of AuburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Guaranty Funding Corporation v. BollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte Southland BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte NorwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ex Parte DCH Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API