Legal Opinion
Hill v. Contract Beverages, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1976No. 45622PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Certiorari to the Department of Employment Services to re view a decision of the commissioner of employment services disqualifying relator for unemployment benefits. We affirm.
Relator, a resident of St. Paul, was employed in November 1973 by Contract Beverages, Inc., respondent-employer, located in Eagan, Minnesota. When he was first employed, he was placed on the third shift (11 p. m. to 7:30 a. m.). After an intervening layoff, he was called back to work in March 1974. On this rehiring he was assigned to the first shift (7 a. m. to 3:30 p. m.).
When relator applied for work, he explained to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Johnson v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
3Cited by9 opinions
- Self v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Deering v. Unitog Rental ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Work Connection, Inc. v. BuiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Cherry v. American National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Hackenmiller v. Ye Olde Butcher ShoppeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.