Legal Opinion

Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1961No. 4940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Employment Security was justified in ruling that the plaintiff employee was disqualified to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she voluntarily left her employment due to lack of transportation from her home to her place of employment. The employee emphasizes that she left her employment in good faith and without fault on her part, and therefore her termination of employment was in effect involuntary rather than voluntary. This argument may have merit in theory and has been approved under the provisions of some unemployment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Copeland v. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Nordhoff v. REV. BD. IND. EMP. SEC. DIV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Davidson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Kontner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Zupancic Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Self v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Harris v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Morgan v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employ. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. St. Germain v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Bateman v. Howard Johnson CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API