Legal Opinion

Deering v. Unitog Rental Services

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1986No. C2-85-1783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Relator, Joyce Deering, appeals by writ of certiorari from a determination that she was discharged for misconduct and was not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.

FACTS

Joyce Deering worked for Unitog Rental Services until November 1984, when she was discharged due to her poor attendance record. She was rehired by Unitog in February 1985, on the condition that she maintain a perfect attendance record for six months. Deering signed an agreement that indicated that if she were absent or tardy even once during that six month period, she would be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor OutletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Tester v. Jefferson LinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Washington v. Amway Grand PlazaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Cherry v. American National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Gilbert v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Deike v. SmeltingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Gilbert v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API