Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City of Gastonia

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 167PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

Of the underlying questions to be properly considered on this appeal, appellee states in substance this one: Did the defendant wrongfully take possession of the water and sewer lines which are the subj ect of this controversy and appropriate the same to its own use without compensation therefor? In the light of the agreed facts this Court is constrained to hold that this question must be answered in the affirmative. The cases of Farr v. Asheville, 205 N.C. 82, 170 S.E. 125, and Spaugh v. Winston-Salem, 234 N.C. 708, 68 S.E. 2d 838, upon which defendant, appellee, mainly relies are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Charlotte Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Farr v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Olde Severna Park Improvement Ass'n v. GunbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API