Legal Opinion

Covington v. City of Rockingham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1966No. 524PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, C.J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain its motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence.

It is clear from the evidence that in May 1948 plaintiff husband constructed an eight-inch sewer line, 58 feet in length, from a manhole in Rockingham’s sewer outfall under U. S. Highway No. 1, to his premises, and at the end of this line constructed a manhole on the premises of plaintiffs. From this manhole the plaintiffs ran laterals through their property aggregating 379 feet. According to plaintiffs’ evidence, these sewer lines were installed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Carson v. Brockton Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Patterson v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Candler v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNeill v. Harnett CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Barnhill Sanitation Service, Inc. v. Gaston CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v. City of Rocky MountDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  4. Carolina Water Serv v. Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API