Legal Opinion
In re Katz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 27, 1982No. Appeal No. 82-521PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) sustaining rejection of claims 1, 5,17, and 18, all remaining claims in application Serial No. 937,574 for “Induction of Immunological Tolerance.” The subject application is a divisional application of application Serial No. 764,586, filed February 3, 1977, and is entitled to that filing date. The claims were rejected because of a description of the subject matter of the invention in a publication dated June 1976, which appellant, however, asserts is a description of his own work.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Solo Cup Co. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Solo Cup Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
3Cited by31 opinions
- Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Manufacturing, l.p.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- David M. Rapoport v. William C. Dement, Mark R. Rosekind, and Jeffrey L. SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.