Legal Opinion

In re Schlittler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 21, 1956No. 6263PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoRlet, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 11 to 15, inclusive, of appellants’ application for a patent on ‘Amines and Process for the Preparation of Amines.” Claims 11 and 13 are the only appealed claims which have been considered on their merits. Claims 12, 14, and 15 stand rejected as not readable on the elected species, no generic claim having been allowed. Under such Circumstances, those claims are not before us for consideration on their merits. In re Stoll et al., 34 C. C. P.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of Lyle B. BorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. In re KatzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API