Legal Opinion
Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Manufacturing, l.p.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 5, 2005No. 2004-1273PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On remand from this court, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, on summary judgment, determined that Biocrest Manufacturing, L.P., Stratagene Holding Corporation, and Stratagene, Inc. (collectively Stratagene) infringed Invitrogen Corporation’s (Invitrogen’s) U.S. Patent No. 4,981,797 (issued Jan. 1, 1991) (the ’797 patent), and that the ’797 patent was not invalid for indefiniteness, although it was invalid because of public use under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Mfg., No. A-01-CA-167-SS (W.D.Tex. Feb. 12, 2004)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.