Legal Opinion
Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 9, 2014No. 2013-1437PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Montana denied plaintiff-appellant Trebro Manufacturing, Ine.’s (Trebro) motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants-appellees FireFly Equipment, LLC and Steven R. Aposhian (collectively, FireFly) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,336,638 (the '638 patent). Trebro Mfg., Inc. v. FireFly Equip., LLC, No. 13-CV-0036, 2013 WL 1655993 (D.Mont. Apr. 17, 2013) (Order). Because the district court abused its discretion in denying Trebro’s motion, this court vacates the order and remands for further proceedings…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Natera, Inc. v. Neogenomics Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.