Legal Opinion

Witherspoon v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1989No. 84-71PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant James D. Witherspoon appeals his conviction of a single count of possession of heroin, D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988 Repl.), on the grounds that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel where the trial judge failed to conduct inquiries into whether defense counsel had an actual conflict of interest with appellant and had adequately prepared appellant’s case.

In Singley v. United States, 548 A.2d 780 (D.C.1988), the court stated that when the trial judge fails to conduct an inquiry after being apprised of the possibility of a conflict of interest on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. McCrimmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Bourn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API