Legal Opinion

Veney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1999No. 96-CF-1794PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

A jury convicted appellant Ricardo Ve-ney of second-degree murder while armed, 1 for the killing of Sean Nelson, first degree murder while armed 2 for the killing of Eric Briscoe, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, 3 carrying a pistol without a license, 4 and escape. 5 Ve-ney appeals asserting: (1) the performance of his trial attorney was adversely affected by an actual conflict of interest; and (2) the trial court committed error in imposing a consecutive sentence for escape. We affirm Veney’s convictions, but remand the case in part for resentencing.

I

In…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. McCraney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Wages v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Freeman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API