Legal Opinion

Boyd v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1991No. 86-1734PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Cynthia A. Boyd appeals from her conviction by a jury of possession of heroin, D.C.Code § 33-541 (1989 Repl.), on the principal ground that she was denied her constitutional right to testify. We hold that the right to testify is a fundamental constitutional right that can only be waived by the defendant, and that the trial judge erred in failing to hold a hearing to determine whether or not Boyd had waived her right to testify when she asserted that she had wanted to testify. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court.

I

On the evening of her arrest, Boyd…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. Lionel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API