Legal Opinion

Work v. Whittington

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1923No. Civ. No. 3789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting plaintiff a new trial in an action tried by a jury.

Plaintiff, the holder of two promissory notes executed by defendants as the makers and indorsed by the payee, brought the action to recover on the notes. He claimed that they had been indorsed and delivered to him before maturity, in due course, and without notice to him of any infirmity in them, and that he paid full value therefor. Wherefore he claimed that he was entitled to recover regardless of any fraud which the payee may have practiced upon these defendants.

Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Shilling v. DodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Malloway v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Dreyer v. CyriacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Owings v. GatchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API