Legal Opinion

Owings v. Gatchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1939No. Civ. 10611PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

A sedan automobile owned and driven by-Charles H. Gatchell, and a roadster belonging to Elmer Owings and driven with his consent by Edwin Coe, collided on the main highway just south of Redwood City at about 1:30 o’clock in the afternoon. Mary Owings, 70 years of age and the mother of Elmer Owings, was riding with Coe at the time of the accident; and on account of the injuries she claims to have sustained therein she joined with her son in bringing this action for damages against the drivers of both automobiles, Mrs. Owings seeking to be compensated for personal injuries, and her son for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Roberts v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Abercrombie v. ThomsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Cope v. GobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Gardner v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Myles v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API