Shilling v. Dodge
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused through the negligence of defendant.
The case was tried by a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. Judgment followed in accordance therewith. Plaintiff moved for a new trial upon the ground, among others, of insufficiency of evidence to justify the verdict. An order in general terms was made granting the motion, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.
As we view the case under this general order it is unnecessary to consider other specifications of error than those of insufficiency of evidence to justify…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Condee v. GygerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Byxbee v. DeweyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Weringer v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Work v. WhittingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Zurich Insurance v. Coachella Valley Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931