Legal Opinion

Drilling v. Berman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1999No. C9-98-1571PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellants Lloyd Drilling, Carolyn Chal-mers, Eric S. Janus and Brickell Partners appeal from a judgment dismissing their shareholder derivative claims against respondent Grand Casinos, Inc. and individual respondents Lyle Berman, Patrick R. Cruzen, Timothy J. Cope, Stanley M. Taube, David W. Anderson, Morris Goldfarb, Ronald Kramer, and David L. Rogers. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Grand Casinos, Inc. (Grand) is a publicly traded corporation involved in the gaming industry. Lyle Berman, Patrick R. Cruzen, Stanley M. Taube, Morris Goldfarb, Ronald Kramer, and David L.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Best & FlanaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Finley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Charlotte Kokocinski v. Arthur D. Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Curtis v. NevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Madvig v. GaitherDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API