Legal Opinion

Finley v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2000No. E024743, E024843PublishedCited by 15 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Several related homeowners associations used homeowner-paid assessments to make contributions to a political action committee to support a local Orange County ballot measure. Plaintiffs, who are members of the homeowners associations, challenge these contributions as ultra vires, illegal, and in violation of their constitutional rights to free speech and association.

Plaintiffs have filed both a writ petition and an appeal. In the writ proceeding, we issued an alternative writ and consolidated the proceeding with the appeal. In the appeal, plaintiffs contend they were entitled…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Best & FlanaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Patrick v. Alacer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Oakland Raiders v. NATIONAL FOORBALL LEAGUECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Desaigoudar v. MeyercordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Everest Investors 8 v. McNeil PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API