Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Nevens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 2001No. 00SA314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. INTRODUCTION

In this original proceeding involving a shareholder's derivative suit, we address the seope of the trial court's review when asked to approve the appointment of a special litigation committee ("SLC") before the committee has begun its investigation. Recently, in Hirsch v. Jones Intercable, Inc., 1 we held that the trial court's review of the committee's work and recommendation must be deferential and limited to an inquiry into the independence and good faith of the committee and the reasonableness of its procedures.

Here, the trial court, after finding the committee to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,704 Dr. Malik M. Hasan and Seeme Hasan v. Clevetrust Realty InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Kaplan v. WyattCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Day v. StascavageColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  4. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API