Legal Opinion
Madvig v. Gaither
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided October 11, 2006No. 1:05 CV 234PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HOWELL, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court in accordance with 28, United States Code, Section 636(c), and on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (# 11). Subsequent to the filing of the motion to dismiss, the court allowed upon motion discovery as to the statutory Motion to Dismiss, which was duly completed. At the conclusion of such discovery period, plaintiff filed his Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (# 48) which was supported by exhibits. On July 25, 2006, defendants’ timely filed their reply (# 50), which closed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- In Re the Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Cleveland HATCHER, SSN 253-44-0377, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. WillettsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Green v. CondraNorth Carolina Business Court · 2009
- Jt Russell & Sons, Inc. v. RussellNorth Carolina Business Court · 2025
- Sherry v. ChioiniDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Ward v. Fsc I, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2016