State v. Griffin (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifeR, J.
Background
{¶ 1} Appellee, De’Argo Griffin, was convicted of, among other things, engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. The convictions were affirmed. 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2012-Ohio-503, 2012 WL 439588. The Second District Court of Appeals granted Griffin’s application to reopen his appeal to allow him to argue that his appellate counsel had been ineffective for failing to challenge the jury instructions defining the term “enterprise.” The court of appeals ultimately concluded that the jury instructions had been inadequate, based on that district’s decision in State v. Franklin,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. ComenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Cincinnati v. EppersonOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HughkeithOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. BlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.