Legal Opinion

Boyle v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 2009No. 07-1309PublishedCited by 779 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

We are asked in this case to decide whether an association-in-fact enterprise under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. § 1961 et seq., must have “an ascertainable structure beyond that inherent in the pattern of racketeering activity in which it engages.” Pet. for Cert. i. We hold that such an enterprise must have a “structure” but that an instruction framed in this precise language is not necessary. The District Court properly instructed the jury in this case. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I

A

The evidence at petitioner’s trial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by779 opinions

  1. In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Calvin Walker v. Beaumont Indep School DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Daniel MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. Crest Construction II, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Eclectic Properties East, LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

774 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API