Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Epperson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1969No. 68-297PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Two questions of law presented by appellant in this appeal command our attention.

In respect to the first question of law, appellant contends that the trial court had “a mandatory duty to give instructions to the jury with respect to defendant’s theory of defense * * * and its failure to give such instructions when requested by the defendant * * * constitutes prejudicial error.”

Two of the instructions requested read as follows:

*61(1) “There is nothing in the laws of the city of Cincinnati which forbids or prohibits a person from delivering packages for compensation as long as he possesses an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CorkranOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. GusterOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API