Legal Opinion

In re S.L.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 2003No. C6-02-1467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant challenges her adjudication of delinquency for committing second-degree burglary, arguing that the district court committed reversible error when it failed to permit her to withdraw her guilty plea. Appellant contends that the state violated the negotiated plea agreement by not equivocally recommending to the district court the agreed-upon stay of adjudication. Because the state did not follow through on its promise to recommend a stay of adjudication, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On January 1, 2002, the day before appellant S.L. was scheduled to enter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barragan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. KortkampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. KunshierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API