Legal Opinion
State v. DeZeler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1988No. C3-87-1845PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We granted the state’s petition for review in this case not because we disagree with the ultimate conclusion of the court of appeals — that defendant is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea — but because we believe that the reasoning used by the court of appeals is inconsistent with that which we have used in a number of cases.
Defendant, Mark Robert DeZeler, knowingly bought a stolen motor boat valued at over $10,000 from one Robert Metz for $3,500. On the opening day of the fishing season in 1986, the true owner, Bradley Bergquist of Plymouth, was at Myrmar Lodge on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. HandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Joon Kyu Kim v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. KortkampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.