Legal Opinion
State v. Ferraro
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1987No. CX-86-1461PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree pursuant to a plea agreement. After acceptance of the plea, but before sentencing, appellant moved to withdraw the plea or for a downward departure from the presumptive sentence. The requests were denied. Appellant claims (1) the trial court erred in not permitting him to withdraw his plea and his conviction should be vacated, (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and (3) he is entitled to a modified sentence pursuant to amendment to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.
FACTS
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. WolskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KunshierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In re S.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re SlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HeggCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987