Legal Opinion

F.T. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1993No. S-4626PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The superior court adjudicated G.T. a child in need of aid (CINA). F.T., G.T.’s father, timely appealed the adjudication.1 We reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Gordon, born August 12, 1983, is seriously emotionally disturbed and given to outbursts of rage and verbal and physical attacks.

The Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth Services (DFYS) first became involved with Gordon’s family in 1985. No child protection issues were substantiated, so the case was closed and no court action was filed. The next DFYS involvement was in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. E.J.S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. K.F. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barber v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. D.E.D. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  3. Morris v. HornAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. R.R. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API