Legal Opinion

N.A. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1996No. S-6619PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

N.A. appeals the termination of her parental rights over SA., and D.A N.A. originally lost custody of S.A. and D.A. because she was unable to take care of them due to alcohol abuse. N.A. later entered alcohol rehabilitation and has been sober for two years. Nevertheless, the superior court terminated her parental rights.

This case requires us to resolve a conflict in our prior decisions concerning the interpretation of AS 47.10.010(a)(2), the statute which governs when a child may be adjudicated to be a child in need of aid (CINA). We must determine which subsections…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. K.N. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. K.F. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Homer Electric Ass'n v. TowsleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API