Legal Opinion
R.R. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1996No. S-6756PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
R.R., the mother of T.M., A.M., S.M., and M.H., claims that her children were improperly removed from her custody by the superi- or court. Her appeal focuses primarily on her youngest child, M.H. She alleges that the superior court made inadequate findings under CIÑA Rule 15(g), that the superior court erroneously concluded that M.H. was a “child in need of aid,” and that the statute authorizing the superior court to appoint guardians is unconstitutionally vague.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
At a hearing on December 18, 1992, the superior court awarded the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- In re L.A.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- R.J.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- J.W. v. R.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- E.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- In re J.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.