Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial and from a subsequent judgment decreeing specific performance of a contract to convey land.
We are here primarily concerned with the sufficiency, under the statute of frauds (M. S. A. 513.05), of a description in a contract for the sale of land and with the admissibility of parol evidence in the application of such description to the property. A further issue arises as to the waiver of conditions precedent in the contract.
Defendants, husband and wife, are owners of slightly less than 40 acres of land in what was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Colstad v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sally-Mike Properties v. YokumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Malevich v. HakolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.