Barnhart v. Herseth
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HISTORY
For many years constitutional revision has been a recognized necessity for the State of South Dakota. On January 21, 1969, the governor impressed upon the joint session of the South Dakota Legislature the need for a comprehensive constitutional revision program. He noted that “We cannot run government in 1969 on the rule book of 1889 and you cannot continue with a patchwork job on the leaky roof of our basic law. Therefore, I recommend this session initiate the needed steps for a realistic revision of our outdated state constitution.” 1969 S.J. 31.
The next day Senate Bill No. 1, “A…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Fugina v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Adams v. HerriedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Hill v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Kahalekai v. DoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Forum for Equality PAC v. McKeithenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Schulte v. LongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Chavez v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.