Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Long

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] The issue on appeal is whether the Attorney General exceeded his statutory authority by including a statement in the ballot explanation for 2004 Initiated Measure 1 that, if adopted, the measure would exempt food from state and municipal sales and use taxes “and eliminate this source of revenue.” The circuit court held that the phrase “and eliminate this source of revenue” in the Attorney General’s explanation is a negative editorial statement outside the statutory authority granted to him under SDCL 12-13-9. We disagree, however, and conclude that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Brink v. DannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. GalatiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barnhart v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brendtro v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Citizens Right to Recall v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Thomas v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Montana Consumer Finance Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. South Dakota State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO v. JackleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API