Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Mickelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1993No. 18162PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Circuit Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Applicants Cummings, Kabeiseman and Andal (hereinafter Applicants) challenge the authority of the Governor of the State of South Dakota, George S. Mickelson, to appoint two attorneys to the positions of Circuit Court Judge. The basis for this challenge is the question of when a person receiving such an appointment must establish his or her residency within the judicial circuit to which he or she is appointed as required by Art. V, § 6 of the South Dakota Constitution.

ISSUES PRESENTED

I

Should a writ of prohibition be denied when the acts sought to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jones v. MontagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. McGaughey v. GraystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Mark VargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Maynard v. HeerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API