Legal Opinion

Fugina v. Donovan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 1960No. 38,222PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loevinger, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court by a taxpayer to prevent the secretary of state from submitting to the votersi á constitutional amendment proposed by Ex. Sess. L. 1959, c. 89, on the ground it is multifarious in contravention of Minn. Const, art. 14, § 1.

Chapter 89 proposes to amend Minn. Const, art. 4, §§ 1 and 9.1

The amendment to § 1 would have the effect of permitting the legislature to extend the term of any session for not more than 30 days beyond 90 legislative days. The amendment to § 9 would have the effect of permitting legislators to serve as notaries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Pugnier v. RamharterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Winget v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Burrell v. Mississippi State Tax Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Willke v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Andrews v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API