Glanski v. Ervine
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against appellants Bruce Ervine and Elmer Graff 1 in an action in trespass alleging fraud. Appellants argue that it was error for the lower court to have refused to grant their motion for judgment n. o. v.
In considering a motion for judgment n. o. v., the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences capable of being drawn therefrom, must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict winner. Flickinger Estate v. Ritsky, 452 Pa. 69, 305 A.2d 40 (1973). The court must find and consider only that evidence which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Smith v. RenautSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.