Legal Opinion

Andrews v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1917No. 9218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Hall county — Judge Wheeler. September 15, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Where a motion for new trial was set for a hearing on a designated day in vacation, and counsel for both the defendant and the State appeared on that day, and, “after hearing from counsel for the State and movant, the court took the matter under consideration and stated that he would allow counsel for both' sides to file briefs,” the trial judge had the right to reserve his decision and to render and announce it at a later date in vacation (Central Railroad &c. Co. v. Farley, 89 Ca. 180, 15 S. E. 34; Dickerson v. Mann, 69 Ga. 729 (4)); and the fact that he may not have had jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Price & Maas v. Bell & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Dickinson v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Elkins v. RobersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. McBurney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API