Price & Maas v. Bell & Son
Supreme Court of Georgia
Pleading and practice. Partnership. Evidence. Verdict. Before Judge Ross. City court of Macon. June term, 1891. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
Price & Maas sued the firm of T. J. Bell & Son upon an account. No written plea appears to have been filed. A verdict was rendered in favor of the defend*741ants. The plaintiffs excepted to the overruling of their motion for a new trial, and also to the allowance by the coui’t of certain amendments to the brief of evidence. In addition to the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, it was alleged that the court erred in admitting the testimony of T. J. Bell that “the debt sued on was not a partnership debt of T. J. Bell & Son, but was the individual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maynard & Son v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Simon v. Myers & MarcusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Ledbetter & Harris v. DeanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Wilkes v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- McBurney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Freeney v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.