Southeastern Pipe-Line Co. v. Garrett
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. By an amendment to the constitution, proposed and ratified in 1939, it was declared that the judges of the superior court "may, on reasonable notice to the parties, at any time, in vacation, at chambers, hear and determine, by interlocutory or final judgment, any matter or issue, where a jury verdict is not required, or may be waived." Ga. L. 1939, pp. 78-79. Under the foregoing law as applied to the particular facts, it does not appear that the judgment overruling the demurrer, to which exceptions were taken, and a previous judgment purporting to set aside a still earlier judgment, which…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- The People v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan v. Board of Sup'rsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- East Side Lumber & Coal Co. v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Lawson v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Birdsey v. Wesleyan CollegeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Webb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.