Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Mann

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[Dickinson et al. filed a bill against Mann. The trial *730resulted in a verdict and decree for complainants. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was granted, and complainants excepted. Various grounds of error were assigned, among them that the grant of a new trial was error; and that the motion was not male at the term at which the case was tried, nor was there any agreement or order sufficient to authorize a hearing in vacation. (There was an agreement and order, but it was claimed that they themselves were made after the adjournment of the term, and that they…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleming v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. FennellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Dickinson v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API