Legal Opinion

State Board of Equalization v. Carleton

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1990No. A047399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

Appellant California State Board of Equalization appeals from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Curtis Carleton in an action to enforce a guaranty of indebtedness executed by respondent. We reverse. Respondent expressly consented to be responsible for any sales or use tax assessed against the taxpayer even if the principal obligation was materially altered without respondent’s knowledge or consent.

Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 6701, respondent executed and delivered to appellant a written guaranty of the sales and use tax liability of the Curtis…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Southern California First National Bank v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. WolferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Wise v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. Highlands InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. G & W Warren's, Inc. v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API